Examiner finds customer deception, ‘very Ponzi-like’ use of funds at Celsius

Examiner finds customer deception, ‘very Ponzi-like’ use of funds at Celsius
Adoption & Regulations
Like? Do Rank It! Likes

Examiner appointed by the court shoba pillay presented its final report on certain aspects of cryptocurrency celsius bankrupt transactions on Jan. 31. This was ordered on September 31st. 29 and 470 pages, excluding all 31 annexes.

Pillay is a former federal attorney and associate with the law firm of Jenner. She focused on how clients' cryptocurrencies were stored in degrees Celsius, the correctness of the public statements of the corporation, New deposits have been used to pay existing clients, the mining firm's status and tax compliance.

“Celsius promoted itself as an altruistic organization,” Pillay wrote. "Celsius has become known as a selfless organisation," wrote Pillay.

However, "Behind the scenes, Celsius has conducted its affairs in a radically different way from the way it has marketed to its customers in all key respects." The C community was not informed of the deficit. Founder Alex Mashinsky did not live up to his promise to buy unsold chips either.

In addition, pillay documented how society and mashinsky personally exercised control over the price of the indigenous cel token. This effort was not entirely successful, partly as a result of accounting deficiencies. As a result:

“Celsius did not earn sufficient yield on its crypto asset deployments to fully fund its CEL buybacks. Therefore, Celsius did not obtain sufficient performance on its crypto asset deployments to fully fund its LEC buyouts.

Consequently, he started using Bitcoin (CTB) and Ether (ETH) deposited by customers to finance his LEC purchases."

The evidence demonstrates deliberate deception in keeping the flywheel. Ram Ahluwalia, crypto CFA (@ramahluwalia) January 31, 2023. In addition, the company's reward (interest) rates were not related to the performance generated by customer assets, but were expected to outperform competitors. No policy existed to determine rewards prior to July 2021.

Between 2018 and June 30, 2022, it paid $1.36 billion more in rewards than revenue generated from customer assets.

By May 2022, as the price of the LUNA (LUNA) stablecoin plummeted, the company was no longer able to support the price of CEL. It paused withdrawals on June 13, but continued to pay rewards. Continued to pay awards. Pillay wrote:

“Between June 9 and June 12, Celsius did directly use new customer deposits to fund customer withdrawal requests.”

Celsius declared bankruptcy on July 13.

Related: New ‘Celsius token’ may be used to repay creditors: Report

Celsius filed for insolvency on 13 July. She summed up the outstanding debt:

“Celsius Mining’s unpaid utility-related bills were $13,982,152. The reviewer concluded that Celsius's mining activity, established as a subsidiary in October 2020, was "generally up-to-date" on its invoices, with some exceptions.

Celsius defaulted on its debt to third-party mining contractor Core Scientific in October.

Hosting the Celsius Mining, however, hold $46,809,756 in prepayment balances that may be available to offset mining-related liabilities in degrees Celsius." celsius failed a third party mining contractor last October. We had a less rosy tax situation. Pillay found "major gaps in tax compliance." Perhaps not surprisingly, Celsius did not have any tax experts on staff until June 2021.

Even then, no system was created for the timely payment of user and value-added taxes. Ms. Pillay described a general confusion as to how the charges for extraction in degrees Celsius were calculated or collected. As a result, mining in degrees Celsius could be required to pay taxes of up to $20 million in the U.S. states of Texas, Pennsylvania, and Georgia, where it conducts mining activities.

It can be reduced by retroactive exemptions. The Celsius Grid, an organization based in the United Kingdom, faces a potential tax debt.

Celsius’ tax problems were due only to lack of systems, communications and sophistication, Pillay said:

“The Examiner did not uncover any facts suggesting that Celsius or any of its business entities willfully or intentionally failed to pay its tax obligations.”